Skip to main content
Download PDF

Combination of proteasome and HDAC inhibitor enhances HPV16 E7-specific CD8+ T cell immune response and antitumor effects in a preclinical cervical cancer model

Journal of Biomedical Science volume 22, Article number: 7 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA, also known as Vorinostat), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, have been recognized as potent chemotherapeutic drugs. Bortezomib and SAHA are FDA-approved for the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma/mantle cell lymphoma, respectively. Furthermore, the combination of the bortezomib and SAHA has been tested in a variety of preclinical models and in clinical trials and may be ideal for the treatment of cancer. However, it remains unclear how this treatment strategy affects the host immune response against tumors.

Results

Here, we used a well-defined E6/E7-expressing tumor model to examine how the immune system can be motivated to act against tumor cells expressing tumor antigens. We demonstrate that the combination of bortezomib and SAHA elicits potent antitumor effects in TC-1 tumor-bearing mice. Additionally, we are the first to show that treatment with bortezomib and SAHA leads to tumor-specific immunity by rendering tumor cells more susceptible to killing by antigen-specific CD8+ T cells than treatment with either drug alone.

Conclusions

The current study serves an important foundation for the future clinical application of both drugs for the treatment of cervical cancer.

Background

Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor recognized as a potent chemotherapeutic agent that is currently used to treat relapsed multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma (for review see [1]). Bortezomib inhibits the 26S proteasome, which is a key regulator of intracellular protein degradation. The downstream effects of bortezomib include antitumor effects, which are the result of inhibiting tumor cell proliferation or promoting tumor cell apoptosis [2]. Bortezomib-induced tumor cell apoptosis may enhance the immunogenicity of tumor cells and provide an opportunity for generating tumor-specific immunity [3]. We have previously elucidated the immune mechanism of the antitumor effects of bortezomib in an ovarian cancer model and found that bortezomib can be used to promote the generation of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells [4]. It is important to further elucidate this mechanism, to determine the utility of bortezomib as a therapeutic agent in additional cancer models, and to identify other therapeutic agents that may enhance the antitumor effects of bortezomib.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have been identified as a class of drugs with anticancer properties that can potentially be used in conjunction with bortezomib to further enhance its cancer therapeutic effects. HDACi inhibit an enzyme responsible for the deacetylation of histones, and lead to the expression of suppressed genes and regulation of abnormal cell growth [5]. HDACi may also contribute to cancer control by histone-independent mechanisms by modifying the acetylation of non-histone proteins such as p53 [6] and heat shock protein-90 [7]. These mechanisms produce antitumor effects including induced differentiation, cell growth arrest, and an increase in apoptosis [8,9]. Furthermore, it has been shown that treating cells with HDACi can lead to the upregulation of MHC class I and II molecules [10]. This suggests that tumor cells may become more susceptible to tumor-specific CD8+ T cell immunotherapy following treatment with an HDACi. One HDACi with therapeutic characteristics is suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA, also known as Vorinostat), which is an FDA approved HDACi used in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [11]. SAHA may be an ideal drug to use in combination with bortezomib for the treatment of cancer.

Indeed, bortezomib and SAHA have previously been used in combination in a xenogeneic model for the treatment of cervical cancer [12]. This study found that bortezomib-mediated cervical cancer cell apoptosis might be facilitated by blocking E6-mediated proteasomal degradation of p53. Furthermore, because HPV oncoprotein E7 is known to interact with class I HDACs [13], Lin et al examined the effects of SAHA with bortezomib on tumor cell apoptosis. They found that the combination elicited synergistic killing of HPV-expressing cervical cancer cell lines and that the combination treatment diminished tumor growth of HeLa xenografts more effectively than either drug alone. Encouraged by these results, we took the opportunity to examine a different aspect of the effects of bortezomib and SAHA, namely, the host immune response against tumor cells.

In the current study, we used a well-defined E6/E7-expressing tumor model to examine how the immune system can be motivated to act against tumor cells expressing tumor antigens. We demonstrate that the combination of bortezomib and SAHA elicits potent antitumor effects in TC-1 tumor-bearing mice. Furthermore, we are the first to show that treatment with bortezomib and SAHA leads to tumor-specific immunity by rendering tumor cells more susceptible to killing by antigen-specific CD8+ T cells than treatment with either drug alone. Considering that both bortezomib and SAHA are FDA-approved for the treatment of specific types of cancer, this study has significant translational value.

Methods

Mice

Six- to 8-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD, USA) and housed in the oncology animal facility of the Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, MD, USA). All animal procedures were performed according to approved protocols and in accordance with recommendations for the proper use and care of laboratory animals.

Reagents and cell lines

We have previously generated an E7-expressing tumorigenic cell line, TC-1 [14], and a firefly luciferase-expressing TC-1 cell line, TC-1-luc [15]. The H-2Db-restricted HPV16 E7aa49-57 peptide, RAHYNIVTF, was synthesized by Macromolecular Resources (Denver, CO) at a purity of ≥80%. PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD3 (clone 17A2), anti-mouse CD45 (clone 30-F11), FITC and PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a (clone 53.6.7), FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD4 (clone RM4-5), FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2) antibodies were purchased from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA). PE-conjugated, HPV16 E749-57 peptide loaded H-2Db tetramer was provided by NIAID tetramer core facility (Atlanta, GA). Commercially available bortezomib (PS341; Millennium Pharmaceuticals) was reconstituted according to the manufacturer’s instructions and diluted in 0.9% saline before in vivo administration. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA, LC Laboratories) was dissolved in DMSO and then diluted in 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin solution before each injection.

Cell viability assay

To determine the viability of TC-1 cells after bortezomib and SAHA treatment, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt (MTS, Promega) assay was performed. Briefly, TC-1 cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 103 cells/well and incubated at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2 for 12 hours. The cells were then treated with various concentrations of bortezomib or SAHA for 48 hours, respectively. At the end of the treatment period, MTS reagent was added to each well, and the plate was incubated for 4 hours at 37°C in the dark. After incubation, the absorbance was measured at 490 nm using the VERSA Max Microplate Reader. Data from three independent experiments were analyzed and normalized to the absorbance of wells containing media only (0%) and untreated cells (100%). The IC50 values were calculated from sigmoidal dose-response curves using MS Excel software. As shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1, the IC50 for bortezomib in TC-1 cells is 7.1 nM and that for SAHA is 25.7 μM.

In vivo treatment experiments

C57BL/6 mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 3 × 104 TC-1 cells/per mouse on day 0. The tumor-bearing mice were divided into four groups (5 per group) based on the treatment regimens: control (2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin solution only), bortezomib only, SAHA only, both bortezomib and SAHA. For the administration of bortezomib, 1 mg/kg of bortezomib was injected intraperitoneally on days 5, 8, 11, and 14 after tumor inoculation. For the SAHA administration, 30 mg/kg of SAHA was injected inraperitoneally into tumor-bearing mice daily from day 5 to day 14 after tumor inoculation. The control group received the vehicle alone using the same schedule as SAHA treatment.

Tumor measurement

Tumor size was monitored by measuring the longest dimension (length) and shortest dimension (width) using dial calipers at 3-day intervals. Tumor volume was calculated by the following formula: tumor diameter = 0.5 × (length + width).

Preparation of single-cell suspensions from TC-1 tumors

Four days after the last treatment, TC-1 tumors were resected from mouse, placed in RPMI-1640 medium containing 100U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and washed with PBS. The solid tumors were then minced into 1- to 2-mm pieces and immersed in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium containing 0.05 mg/ml collagenase I, 0.05 mg/ml collagenase IV, 0.025 mg/ml hyaluronidase IV, 0.25 mg/ml DNase I, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and incubated at 37°C with periodic agitation. The tumor digest was then filtered through a 70-μm nylon filter mesh to remove undigested tissue fragments. The resultant single tumor cell suspensions were washed twice in Hank’s buffered salt solution (HBSS) (400 g for 10 min), and viable cells were determined using trypan blue dye exclusion.

HPV16 E7-specific CD8+ T cell responses in tumor-bearing mice treated with bortezomib and/or SAHA

Groups of C57BL/6 mice (5 per group) were challenged with TC-1 tumor cells and treated with bortezomib and/or SAHA as described above. To detect HPV16 E7-specific CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were harvested from the tail vein one week after the last treatment. The cells were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) and PE-conjugated HPV16 E7 aa49-57 peptide loaded H-2Db tetramer and acquired with FACSCalibur.

To detect HPV16 E7-specific CD8+ T cells in the tumor, single cell suspensions were stimulated with HPV16 E7 aa49-57 peptide (1 μg/ml) in the presence of GolgiPlug (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) overnight at 37°C. The cells were then stained with PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a. After permeabilization and fixation, the cells were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ followed by flow cytometry analysis. The data were analyzed with FlowJo or CellQuest Pro software.

IFN-γ secretion in E7-specific cytotoxic T cells induced by bortezomib and/or SAHA pretreated TC-1 cells

2 × 105 TC-1 cells per well were plated in 6-well plates and treated with bortezomib (3.5 nM) and/or SAHA (12.5 μM) for 24 hours. The cells were then harvested and 1 × 105 tumor cells per well were co-incubated with E7-specific cytotoxic T cells in 96-well plates at 37°C for 4 hours (E:T ratio of 1:1) at the presence of GolgiPlug. The cells were then harvested and stained with PE-conjugated CD8 and FITC-conjugated IFN-γ. The cells were acquired with FACSCalibur and analyzed with FlowJo.

In vitro cytotoxic T cell assay

For the in vitro cytotoxic T cell assay, luciferase-expressing TC-1 tumor cells were added to 96-well plates (1 × 104 per well) and incubated overnight at 37°C. The cells were then treated with bortezomib (3.5 nM) and/or SAHA (12.5 μM) for 24 hours and were used as target cells. After washing with PBS, HPV16 E7-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTLs), generated as previously described [16], were added to the target cells t different E:T ratios and incubated at 37°C for 4 hours. The target cells incubated without CTLs served as a negative control. Luciferin (1.3 × 10−4 mg per well) was added to the wells for optical imaging. The expression of luciferase was measured using the IVIS luminescence imaging system series 2000. Bioluminescence signals were acquired for 30 seconds.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were replicated twice independently. All data were expressed as means ± standard error (SE) and are representative of at least two independent experiments. Otherwise indicated, the statistical significance of difference was assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test using SPSS version 16.0. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Combination treatment of bortezomib and SAHA generates potent antitumor effects in TC-1 tumor-bearing mice

We first characterized the antitumor effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA, alone or in combination against the E7-epressing TC-1 tumor model in C57BL/6 mice. Groups of mice were treated according to the regimens outlined in Figure 1A. Mice were challenged with TC-1 cells and then began the various treatments five days later. Bortezomib was injected intraperitoneally at 3 day intervals. SAHA was administered daily from day 5 to day 14 by intraperitoneal injection. As shown in Figure 1B and Additional file 2: Figure S2, mice treated with bortezomib or SAHA alone had lower tumor volumes and weights than mice treated with vehicle alone. Furthermore, mice treated with the combination of bortezomib and SAHA experienced significantly lower tumor volume than any other treatment regimen. These data suggest that bortezomib and SAHA elicit synergistic antitumor effects in TC-1 tumor-bearing mice.

Figure 1
figure 1

In vivo tumor treatment experiments. Groups of C57BL/6 mice were subcutaneously challenged with 3 × 104 TC-1 tumor cells per mouse on day 0. On day 5, the tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into four groups (5 per group) and treated with one of the following regimens: vehicle, bortezomib alone (1 mg/kg, once every 3 days), SAHA alone (30 mg/kg, once per day), or the combination of bortezomib and SAHA. Bortezomib and SAHA were injected intraperitoneally and the treatment lasted for a total of 10 days. A. Schematic diagram of the treatment regimens. B. Line graph depicting the tumor volume in TC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated with bortezomib and/or SAHA (mean + SE; p < 0.05).

Full size image

Combination treatment of bortezomib and SAHA elicits antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in TC-1 tumor-bearing mice

In order to characterize the antigen-specific cell-mediated immune responses generated by bortezomib and SAHA, groups of TC-1 tumor-bearing mice were treated as illustrated in Figure 1A. Splenocytes were harvested from tumor-bearing mice one week after the last treatment and stimulated with HPV16 E7 peptide (aa49-57). The splenocytes were stained for CD8 and IFN-γ expression and analyzed by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 2A and B, a higher number of activated CD8+ T cells were among splenocytes isolated from mice treated with bortezomib and SAHA compared to those from mice treated with bortezomib or SAHA alone. Additionally, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were harvested from the tail vein one week after the last treatment and then stained for CD8 expression and E7-specificity using E7 peptide-loaded H-2Db tetramer. Mice treated with the combination of bortezomib and SAHA generated a significantly higher percentage of E7-specific CD8+ T cells among PBMCs compared to those treated with bortezomib or SAHA alone (Figure 2C and D). These data suggest that, together, bortezomib and SAHA have a better ability to generate antigen-specific CD8+ T cells than separately.

Figure 2
figure 2

Flow cytometry analysis to determine HPV16 E7-specific CD8 + T cell responses in tumor-bearing mice treated with bortezomib and/or SAHA. Groups of C57BL/6 mice (5 per group) were challenged with TC-1 tumor cells and treated with bortezomib and/or SAHA according to Figure 1A. Splenocytes from tumor-bearing mice were harvested one week after the last treatment and were stimulated with HPV16 E7aa49-57 peptide (1 μg/ml). The cells were then stained with PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-γ and analyzed by flow cytometry. A. Bar graph depicting the number of E7-specific IFN-γ-secreting CD8+ T cells per 2 × 105 pooled splenocytes (mean + SE; p < 0.01). B. Representative data of flow cytometry E7 peptide-loaded H-2Db tetramer staining in the various groups. C. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were harvested from the tail vein one week after the last treatment. Cells were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a and PE-conjugated HPV16 E7aa49-57 peptide loaded H-2Db tetramer and acquired with FACSCalibur. D. Bar graph depicting the percentage of E7 tetramer CD8+ T cells in PBMCs (p < 0.05).

Full size image

Combination treatment of bortezomib and SAHA generates higher percentage of CD8+ T cells and antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the tumor

Next, we set out to characterize the immune responses generated by bortezomib and SAHA in the tumor microenvironment. TC-1 tumor-bearing mice were treated following the regimen described in Figure 1A. 4 days after the last treatment, tumors were resected and prepared into single tumor cells suspension by enzymatic digestion for analyses. As shown in Figure 3A and B, treatments with SAHA alone or SAHA in combination with bortezomib induce higher numbers of CD8+ T cells in the tumor. Furthermore, the ratios of CD8:CD4 T cells are also higher in the tumors of mice treated with SAHA alone or SAHA with bortezomib (Figure 3C). In addition, treatments with SAHA alone or SAHA combined with bortezomib result in the highest number of E7-specific IFN-γ + CD8+ T cells in the tumors (Figure 3D and F). These data show that treatments with SAHA alone or SAHA in combination with bortezomib generate higher percentage of CD8+ T cells and higher number of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the tumors. Importantly, although SAHA alone appears to induce CD8+ T cells immune responses in the tumors, only treatment with SAHA in combination with bortezomib results in the best antitumor effects (Figure 1B).

Figure 3
figure 3

Analysis of TC-1 tumor infiltrating lymphocytes after treatment. Groups of female C57BL/6 mice (5 per group) were injected with 3 × 104 of TC-1 tumor cells subcutaneously. Five days after tumor cell injection, the mice were treated through intraperitoneal injection with one of the following regimens: vehicle, bortezomib alone (1 mg/kg, once every 3 days), SAHA alone (30 mg/kg, once per day), or the combination of bortezomib and SAHA as described in Figure 1A. 4 days after last treatment, the tumors were resected from the mice and the single tumor cell suspension cells were prepared by enzymatic digestion. The cells were then stained with anti-mouse CD3, CD4 and CD8, or stimulated with HPV16 E7aa49-57 peptide at the presence of GolgiPlug overnight followed by flow cytometry analysis A. Representative of CD3 and CD8 staining images of TC-1 tumor single cell suspension. B. Summary of the infiltrating CD3+CD8+ T cells in TC-1 tumor. C. Summary of CD3+CD4+/CD3+CD8+ ratio of infiltrating lymphocytes in TC-1 tumor. D. Representative of IFN-γ intracellular staining images of TC-1 tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells. E. Summary of IFN-γ intracellular staining data of TC-1 tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells.

Full size image

Tumor cells treated with bortezomib and SAHA elicit potent antigen-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses

We then treated TC-1 cells with bortezomib and/or SAHA and subsequently incubated them with E7-specific CD8+ T cells. Following incubation, cells were stained for CD8 and IFN-γ expression and analyzed by flow cytometry. Figure 4A and B show that a significantly higher percentage of E7-specific CD8+ T cells incubated with TC-1 cells treated with the combination of bortezomib and SAHA were activated, compared to those incubated with TC-1 cells treated with either bortezomib or SAHA alone. These data suggest that tumor cells treated with the combination of bortezomib and SAHA can activate potent E7-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses.

Figure 4
figure 4

Flow cytometry analysis to determine the ability of bortezomib and/or SAHA pretreated TC-1 cells to induce IFN-γ secretion in E7-specific cytotoxic T cells. TC-1 cells were plated in 6-well plates (2 × 105 /well) and treated with bortezomib (3.5 nM) and/or SAHA (12.5 μM) for 24 h. The cells were then harvested and 1 × 105 tumor cells/well were co-incubated with E7-specific CD8+ T cells in 96-well for 4 h (E:T ratio of 1:1) in the presence of GolgiPlug. The cells were then harvested and stained with PE-conjugated CD8 and FITC-conjugated IFN-γ. Cells were acquired with FACSCalibur and analyzed with FlowJo. A. Representative flow cytometry data demonstrating the percentage of IFN-γ positive cells among E7-specific CTLs induced by TC-1 cells treated with bortezomib and/or SAHA. B. Bar graph depicting the percentage of IFN-γ + E7-specific CTLs among all E7-specific CTLs induced by TC-1 cells treated with bortezomib and/or SAHA.

Full size image

TC-1 cells treated with the combination of bortezomib and SAHA are rendered susceptible to CD8+ T cell-mediated killing

In order to further elucidate the observed antitumor effects generated by bortezomib and SAHA in tumor-bearing mice (Figure 1), we examined the effect of bortezomib and SAHA treatment on the susceptibility of TC-1 cells to CD8+ T cell-mediated killing. Luciferase-expressing TC-1 cells were treated with bortezomib and/or SAHA and then incubated with E7-specific CD8+ T cells. As shown in Figure 5A and B, E7-specific CD8+ T cells elicited the most potent cytotoxic effect in the presence of TC-1 cells treated with both bortezomib and SAHA as demonstrated by decreased luminescence intensity. These data suggest that bortezomib and SAHA render TC-1 cells the most susceptible to E7-specific CD8+ T cell-mediated killing.

Figure 5
figure 5

In vitro cytotoxic T cell assay. Luciferase-expressing TC-1 tumor cells were added to 96-well plates (1 × 104 per well) and incubated for 18 h at 37°C. The cells were then treated with bortezomib (3.5 nM) and/or SAHA (12.5 μM) for 24 h. After washing with PBS, HPV16 E7-specific CTLs were added to the cells and incubated at 37°C for 4 hours. The expression of luciferase was measured using the IVIS luminescence imaging system series 2000. Bioluminescence signals were acquired for 30 s. A. Representative luminescence images of 96-well plates showing tumor cell lysis. B. Line graph depicting the quantification of luminescence intensity in tumor cells treated with drugs and/or E7-specific CTLs in different E:T ratio data shown as mean ± SE.

Full size image

Discussion

In the current study, we examined the effects of bortezomib and SAHA combination treatment on host immune responses against the TC-1 tumor model. We found that while bortezomib and SAHA elicited antitumor effects in TC-1 tumor-bearing mice, the combination of the two drugs created a synergistic effect. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the combination of bortezomib and SAHA generated significantly greater E7-specific CD8+ T cells in the spleen and circulation compared to treatment with either drug alone. We also showed that treatments with SAHA alone or SAHA in combination with bortezomib induce higher percentage of CD8+ T cells and more antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the tumors, however, only the combination treatment resulted in the best antitumor outcomes. In addition, we showed that treatment of TC-1 cells with bortezomib and SAHA led to a significant increase in the potency of antigen-specific CD8+ T cell immune activation. Importantly, we demonstrated that the combination of bortezomib and SAHA rendered TC-1 cells the most susceptible to E7-specific CD8+ T cell-mediated killing, compared to either drug alone.

In the current study, we have observed a significant therapeutic anticancer effect when TC-1 tumor-bearing mice were treated with the combination of bortezomib and SAHA. Our results are consistent with previously reports of synergistic anticancer effects from the combination treatment with bortezomib and SAHA in other cancer models, such as prostate cancer [17], glioblastoma [18], multiple myeloma [19], and T-cell lymphoma [20]. Furthermore, several clinical trials combining bortezomib and SAHA have been reported in multiple myeloma [21], non small-cell lung cancer [22], children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors [23], and in patients with advanced solid tumors [24,25]. Most of these studies mainly focus on the therapeutic effect of the combination treatment rather than how it affects the host immune response and how it renders tumor susceptible to immune-mediated killing. Our results in cervical cancer are an important addition to this body of literature.

Here we show that treatments with either SAHA alone or SAHA in combination with bortezomib can induce higher percentage of CD8+ T cells and more antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the tumor. Although SAHA alone appears to elicit CD8+ T cell immune responses in the tumor, only the combination treatment generated the best antitumor outcomes (Figure 1B). Bortezomib have been shown to enhance the immunogenicity in the tumor microenvironment. Importantly, our combination treatment acts on both antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and tumor cells. The synergistic interaction between the potent CD8+ T cell immune activation following SAHA treatment and the immunostimulating effects of bortezomib likely contributed to the observed potent therapeutic effect. It will be of great interest to elucidate the precise mechanisms of the synergistic therapeutic interactions, which warrants further investigation.

We observed significant enhancement of tumor-specific immunity following treatment with bortezomib and SAHA. Our observations suggest that the combination treatment enhances release of tumor antigen from tumor cells, which are subsequently processed and presented by professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs). The APCs then prime antigen-specific CD8+ T cells through a cross-priming mechanism (for review see [26]). Although here we only characterized E7-specific CD8+ T cells (Figure 2), other tumor antigens were likely released (E6, for example) promoting tumor-specific immunity. It is now clear the tumor-specific immunity can contribute to antitumor effects. Thus, the tumor-specific immunity generated through the combination treatment of bortezomib and SAHA may contribute to the therapeutic antitumor effect in addition to the direct killing of tumor cells by these chemotherapeutic drugs.

We found that tumors treated with both bortezomib and SAHA resulted in a more potent activation of antigen-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses (Figure 4). This could be the result of enhanced antigen processing or presentation through the MHC class I molecule following the combination treatment. It will be helpful to understand the precise mechanisms for such enhanced activation and should be investigated in future studies. Interestingly, our data also show that the combination treatment rendered tumor cells more susceptible to antigen-specific CD8+ T cell killing (Figure 5). Taken together, these data suggest that treatment of tumor-bearing mice with bortezomib and SAHA will potentially create potent immune-mediated therapeutic antitumor effects through not only the enhancement of tumor-specific immunity, but also the enhanced susceptibility of the tumor cells to antigen-specific CD8+ T cell-mediated killing.

Previously, our lab has used bortezomib with therapeutic HPV DNA vaccine for the control of TC-1 tumors [27]. We found that the combination of CRT/E7 DNA vaccine and bortezomib generated more potent antitumor effects in TC-1 tumor-bearing mice compared to either therapy alone. Considering these previous observations as well as our current ones, we suspect that the CRT/E7 DNA vaccine could be combined with bortezomib and SAHA in a highly potent therapy for cervical cancer.

Conclusions

Taken together, our data suggest that the host immune response elicited by the treatment of HPV-associated tumors with both bortezomib and SAHA represents an important pathway contributing to the observed antitumor effects. Both SAHA and bortezomib are commercially available for the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma/mantle cell lymphoma, respectively. In addition, the drug combination has been tested in some clinical trials in patients with advanced cancer. Furthermore, the combination of bortezomib and SAHA has been shown to generate synergistic killing of cervical cancer cell lines directly [12]. Thus, the current study serves an important foundation for the future clinical application of both drugs for the treatment of cervical cancer.

Abbreviations

HDAC:

Histone deacetylase

HDACi:

Histone deacetylase inhibitor

SAHA:

Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid

MHC:

Major histocompatibility complex

PBMC:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell

SE:

Standard error

CRT:

Calreticulin

APC:

Antigen-presenting cell

References

  1. Pellom Jr ST, Shanker A. Development of Proteasome Inhibitors as Therapeutic Drugs. J Clin Cell Immunol. 2012;S5:5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Poulaki V, Chauhan D, Fanourakis G, Gu X, et al. Molecular sequelae of proteasome inhibition in human multiple myeloma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:14374–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spisek R, Charalambous A, Mazumder A, Vesole DH, Jagannath S, Dhodapkar MV. Bortezomib enhances dendritic cell (DC)-mediated induction of immunity to human myeloma via exposure of cell surface heat shock protein 90 on dying tumor cells: therapeutic implications. Blood. 2007;109:4839–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang CL, Hsu YT, Wu CC, Yang YC, Wang C, Wu TC, et al. Immune mechanism of the antitumor effects generated by bortezomib. J Immunol. 2012;189:3209–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wade PA. Transcriptional control at regulatory checkpoints by histone deacetylases: molecular connections between cancer and chromatin. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:693–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roy S, Packman K, Jeffrey R, Tenniswood M. Histone deacetylase inhibitors differentially stabilize acetylated p53 and induce cell cycle arrest or apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:482–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuino L, Bali P, Wittmann S, Donapaty S, Guo F, Yamaguchi H, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor LAQ824 down-regulates Her-2 and sensitizes human breast cancer cells to trastuzumab, taxotere, gemcitabine, and epothilone B. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003;2:971–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marks PA, Dokmanovic M. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: discovery and development as anticancer agents. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2005;14:1497–511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bolden JE, Peart MJ, Johnstone RW. Anticancer activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:769–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Magner WJ, Kazim AL, Stewart C, Romano MA, Catalano G, Grande C, et al. Activation of MHC class I, II, and CD40 gene expression by histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Immunol. 2000;165:7017–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mann BS, Johnson JR, He K, Sridhara R, Abraham S, Booth BP, et al. Vorinostat for treatment of cutaneous manifestations of advanced primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2318–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin Z, Bazzaro M, Wang MC, Chan KC, Peng S, Roden RB. Combination of proteasome and HDAC inhibitors for uterine cervical cancer treatment. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:570–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brehm A, Nielsen SJ, Miska EA, McCance DJ, Reid JL, Bannister AJ, et al. The E7 oncoprotein associates with Mi2 and histone deacetylase activity to promote cell growth. EMBO J. 1999;18:2449–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin KY, Guarnieri FG, Staveley-O’Carroll KF, Levitsky HI, August JT, Pardoll DM, et al. Treatment of established tumors with a novel vaccine that enhances major histocompatibility class II presentation of tumor antigen. Cancer Res. 1996;56:21–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim D, Hung CF, Wu TC. Monitoring the trafficking of adoptively transferred antigen- specific CD8-positive T cells in vivo, using noninvasive luminescence imaging. Hum Gene Ther. 2007;18:575–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang TL, Ling M, Shih IM, Pham T, Pai SI, Lu Z, et al. Intramuscular administration of E7-transfected dendritic cells generates the most potent E7-specific anti-tumor immunity. Gene Ther. 2000;7:726–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sato A, Asano T, Ito K, Asano T. Vorinostat and bortezomib synergistically cause ubiquitinated protein accumulation in prostate cancer cells. J Urol. 2012;188:2410–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Asklund T, Kvarnbrink S, Holmlund C, Wibom C, Bergenheim T, Henriksson R, et al. Synergistic killing of glioblastoma stem-like cells by bortezomib and HDAC inhibitors. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:2407–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell RA, Sanchez E, Steinberg J, Shalitin D, Li ZW, Chen H, et al. Vorinostat enhances the antimyeloma effects of melphalan and bortezomib. Eur J Haematol. 2010;84:201–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang QL, Wang L, Zhang YW, Jiang XX, Yang F, Wu WL, et al. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib interacts synergistically with the histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid to induce T-leukemia/lymphoma cells apoptosis. Leukemia. 2009;23:1507–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dimopoulos M, Siegel DS, Lonial S, Qi J, Hajek R, Facon T, et al. Vorinostat or placebo in combination with bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma (VANTAGE 088): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1129–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoang T, Campbell TC, Zhang C, Kim K, Kolesar JM, Oettel KR, et al. Vorinostat and bortezomib as third-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Wisconsin Oncology Network Phase II study. Invest New Drugs. 2014;32(1):195–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Muscal JA, Thompson PA, Horton TM, Ingle AM, Ahern CH, McGovern RM, et al. A phase I trial of vorinostat and bortezomib in children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors: a Children’s Oncology Group phase I consortium study (ADVL0916). Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60:390–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deming DA, Ninan J, Bailey HH, Kolesar JM, Eickhoff J, Reid JM, et al. A Phase I study of intermittently dosed vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2014;32(2):323–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schelman WR, Traynor AM, Holen KD, Kolesar JM, Attia S, Hoang T, et al. A phase I study of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced malignancies. Invest New Drugs. 2013;31(6):1539–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Joffre OP, Segura E, Savina A, Amigorena S. Cross-presentation by dendritic cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:557–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tseng CW, Monie A, Wu CY, Huang B, Wang MC, Hung CF, et al. Treatment with proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enhances antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell-mediated antitumor immunity induced by DNA vaccination. J Mol Med (Berl). 2008;86:899–908.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Cervical Cancer SPORE P50CA098252, Head and Neck Cancer SPORE P50 CA-DE019032, and 2R01CA114425-06 grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, CRB II Room 307, 1550 Orleans Street, 21231, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Zhuomin Huang, Shiwen Peng, Jayne Knoff, Sung Yong Lee, Benjamin Yang, Tzyy-Choou Wu & Chien-Fu Hung

  2. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Tzyy-Choou Wu

  3. Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Tzyy-Choou Wu

  4. Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Tzyy-Choou Wu

  5. Department of Gynecology, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China

    Zhuomin Huang

  6. Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

    Sung Yong Lee

Authors
  1. Zhuomin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shiwen Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jayne Knoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sung Yong Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Benjamin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tzyy-Choou Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chien-Fu Hung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Fu Hung.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

SP, CFH and TCW conceived and designed experiments and interpreted data. ZH, SP, SL and BY performed experiments. JK, CFH and TCW wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of bortezomib and SAHA in TC-1 tumor cells. To determine the viability of TC-1 cells after bortezomib and SAHA treatment, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT, 5 mg/ml) assay was performed. TC-1 cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 103 cells/well and incubated at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2 for 12 hours. The cells were then treated with various concentrations of bortezomib or SAHA for 48 h. At the end of the treatment period, MTS reagent was added to each well, and the plate was incubated for 4 h at 37°C in the dark. After incubation, the absorbance was measured at 490 nm using the VERSA Max Microplate Reader. Data from three independent experiments were analyzed and normalized to the absorbance of wells containing media only (0%) and untreated cells (100%). The IC50 values were calculated from sigmoidal dose-response curves using MS Excel software. A. Line graph depicting the IC50 of bortezomib in the TC-1 tumor cell line. B. Line graph depicting the IC50 of SAHA in the TC-1 tumor cell line.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Images and weight of TC-1 tumors after treatment. Groups of female C57BL/6 mice were injected with 3 × 104 of TC-1 tumor cells subcutaneously. Five days after tumor cell injection, the mice were treated through intraperitoneal injection with one of the following regimens: vehicle, bortezomib alone (1 mg/kg, once every 3 days), SAHA alone (30 mg/kg, once per day), or the combination of bortezomib and SAHA as described in Figure 1A. 4 days after last treatment, the tumors were resected from the mice and the weight of tumor was measured. A. Images of TC-1 tumors. B. Summary of the weight of subcutaneous TC-1 tumor.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Z., Peng, S., Knoff, J. et al. Combination of proteasome and HDAC inhibitor enhances HPV16 E7-specific CD8+ T cell immune response and antitumor effects in a preclinical cervical cancer model. J Biomed Sci 22, 7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-014-0111-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-014-0111-1

Keywords

Journal of Biomedical Science

ISSN: 1423-0127